EnvironmentPesticides

Study: Bee-Killing Neonicotinoid Pesticides Are Harming Hummingbirds Too

Image via Liz / Flickr

Recently, Health Canada announced a move to ban the use of certain pesticides containing chemical substances known as neonicotinoids. Scientists have long known such pesticides decimate bee populations, which is bad enough, considering several species have made the endangered list of late. However, current evidence exists showing how these substances harm more than just bees.

Researchers
have found neonicotinoids present in the bodies of birds and other mammals as
well. The substances have caused multiple hummingbird deaths. Scientists now
fear what these substances could do to the human food chain as well as the
planet’s ecology.

What are Neonicotinoid Pesticides?

The term “neonicotinoids” refers to a class of chemicals related in atomic structure to nicotine. And just as nicotine acts on the human nervous system, neonicotinoid pesticides act upon the nervous system of invertebrates such as insects. Although most previous scientific evidence pointed to the fact these compounds are less toxic to vertebrates like birds, mammals and humans, the recent death of myriad hummingbirds from neonicotinoid toxicity indicates the chemicals may not be as innocuous as once thought [1].

Although
the Canadian ban focuses primarily upon three specific types of neonicotinoids,
those who wish to be certain they do not purchase pesticides containing these
substances can look for the following terms on the label:

  • Thiamethoxam
  • Thiocloprid
  • Nitenpyram
  • Imidacloprid
  • Dinotefuran
  • Clothianidin
  • Acetamiprid

Beekeepers
in Canada have denounced Canada’s ban as not extending far enough. For one, the
ban only extends to clothianidin,
imidacloprid and thiamethoxam. Secondly, even though the ban prohibits the use
of these substances on flowering plants and trees bees tend to flock to,
farmers may still use the chemicals on certain grain plants and home gardeners
may continue to use them on plants grown in greenhouses.

Additionally, critics point out the ban gradually phases these substances out over a number of years, rather than banning them immediately. They note that the European Union banned the use of all three neonicotinoid pesticides already.

The toxicity of neonicotinoid pesticides to bees measures at 7,000 times higher than even the toxicity of DDT, a substance banned back in 1972 [2]. Given the toxicity level, it boggles the mind how these pesticides were approved for use in the first place. However, ignorance coupled with lobbying from manufacturers paired with the lack of international standards for the use of these chemicals allowed the crisis to worsen.

Neonicotinoid Pesticides Harming Hummingbirds

Even if neonicotinoid pesticides only proved harmful to bees, continued use of these substances would create serious ecological consequences. Bees pollinate 70 percent of the crop species responsible for feeding 90 percent of the human population [3]. Without bees, world hunger, already at epidemic levels, would increase dramatically.

Were
bees to go extinct, our grocery stores would hold only half the varieties of
fruits and vegetables they now do, as the plants pollinated by bees would
perish. And it isn’t only humans who would go hungry. Animal species whose
digestive tracts have evolved to sustain on a limited variety of foods would go
extinct, also.

Nor are bees the only pollinators humans are losing to neonicotinoids, as the recent hummingbird deaths show. Pesticides and/or their metabolites can be measured in samples of blood, urine, breast milk, amniotic fluid or meconium in mammals [4]. Myriad animals like birds and butterflies who also pollinate plants have evidenced these metabolites when their corpses are examined.

The study that mesured these samples was focused on farming regions in the Fraser Valley and southern British Columbia, the main area where the red-throated rufous hummingbirds are found. The red-throated rufous hummingbird population has declined about 2.67 percent per year from 1966 to 2013 along with two other local species.

Few people who raise backyard chickens would pass Clucky the hen a drag on their cigarette, but neonicotinoid pesticides, once ingested, do impact animal tissue negatively. While proponents of the pesticides claim that the substances traverse the blood-brain barrier poorly if at all in mammals, this hardly renders the chemicals harmless. Humans who have ingested one type of neonicitonoid, imidacloprid, develop symptoms as quickly as 15 minutes after ingestion. Patients exposed to lethal doses experience symptoms similar to those in aspiration pneumonia as well as central nervous system disruption, coma and death [5].

Indeed, due to the use of neonicotinoids, more than half the native species of duck across Canada’s Saskatchewan region are now in sharp decline [6]. The region, once covered with wetlands, now predominates with agricultural grains treated with these chemicals. Plants absorb only roughly 5 percent of the pesticides sprayed on them, meaning the remaining runoff flows into waterways.

Will Other
Nations Follow Canada’s Lead?

Even though critics insist Canada’s measure does not go far enough, it’s a step in the right direction. The European Union, in the meantime, began restricting neonicotinoids back in 2013, and, after a lengthy battle, recently voted to expand the ban in April of 2018 [7]. Primary opponents of expanding the ban included sugar beet farmers who claim no meaningful alternative to neonicotinoids exists. France, however, decided on the ban of all five neonicotinoid pesticides.

The U.S. has instituted no such bans at the federal level, although several states have drafted their own bans on certain types of neonicotinoids. Connecticut recently classified neonicotinoids as a restricted-use substance [8]. Maryland restricts use to only state-certified farmers and veterinarians. Minnesota restricts labeling, prohibiting manufacturers from advertising such pesticides as safe for pollinators, and California plans to revisit the issue this year.

Moving Toward
Eco-Friendly Agriculture

Despite the protests of certain agricultural groups, safer alternatives to neonicotinoid-based pesticides do exist. One natural way to reduce pest infestation involves rotating crops. This method works because insect pests generally infest only one type of crop. Therefore, even if one crop, for example, a certain grain, becomes infested, if the farmer plants soybeans the following year, the grain-eating pests will starve [9].

Additionally, a host of natural pesticides and chemical versions based upon their derivatives exist. The disadvantage of these types of pesticides is many of them are crop specific, meaning horticulturists must invest in more than one to control all types of pests. However, when compared to the ecological disaster which would result from the loss of the earth’s pollinators, this inconvenience appears minor indeed [10].

A Safer World
for Birds, Bees and All Life

Any
step toward eliminating the use of neonicotinoid pesticides marks a step in the
right direction, and Canada deserves applause for taking this crucial move.
Hopefully, other countries, including the U.S., will follow suit, and soon,
while there’s still time to save the birds and bees.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button